CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2017-00292 NATIONAL BRANDS LIMITED vs. TRIZANNE BARNARD
  zoobiscuits.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00291 ROLLS-ROYCE PLC AND ROLLS-ROYCE MOTOR CARS LTD vs. YE LI
  rolls-roycemotorcars.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00290 TANDEM PAPER CC TA OFFICE PRO vs. LINDIE VAN DER WALT
  officepro.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00289 SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT vs. BAMAKETSE PHELADI MOLELE
  siemenspeak.co.za - Pending
siemenstrading.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00288 BENCHMADE KNIFE CO., INC vs. EDMUND MACDONALD (ALL NET HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD)
  Decision: Benchmade Knife Co., Inc vs. Edmund Macdonald (All Net Holdings (Pty) Ltd) benchmade.co.za - Settled
   
   
ZA2017-00287 DORHOLD (PTY) LTD AND KRAZI DOOR (PTY) LTD vs. MRS YVONNE ELS
  krazidoors.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00286 ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. WHOIS AGENT
  absa-barclays.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00285 CAPITEC BANK LIMITED vs. CAPSTONE PROPERTY HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD
  Decision: Capitec Bank Limited vs. Capstone Property Holdings (Pty) Ltd capitech.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2017-00284 KANSAI PLASCON (PTY) LIMITED vs. OYSTER BOX
  Decision: Kansai Plascon (Pty) Limited vs. Oyster Box plasconkansai.co.za - Withdrawn
   
   
ZA2017-00283 THE TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF THE NELSON MANDELA FOUNDATION TRUST vs. KEN MSUKU
  Decision: The Trustees for the time being of the Nelson Mandela Foundation Trust vs. Ken Msuku mandela100.co.za - Transfer
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.