CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2018-00305 ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. PETRONELLA KRUGER
  absaforex.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00304 ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. DARLINGTON OPARA
  absaonlin.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00303 SPOTIFY AB vs. ADMIN
  spotify.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00302 AI STRATFORD FAMILY TRUST vs. WYNAND VAN LOGGERENBERG
  winblock.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2018-00301 MONTAGU DRIED FRUIT & NUTS (PTY) LTD vs. JP VILJOEN
  montagudriedfruit.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00300 THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION (PTY) LTD vs. BRENDON NAICKER
  trinityschool.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2017-00299 CRICKET SOUTH AFRICA vs. HEMANTH BALAJI
  Decision: Cricket South Africa vs. Hemanth Balaji t20gl.co.za - Settled
   
   
ZA2017-00298 CRICKET SOUTH AFRICA vs. MARIMUTHU DEVENDRAN
  Decision: Cricket South Africa vs. Marimuthu Devendran t20globalleague.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2017-00297 1LIFE INSURANCE LIMITED vs. MATTHEW NNADOZIE
  Decision: 1Life Insurance Limited vs. Matthew Nnadozie onelifedirect.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2017-00296 ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. TSAKISI MATHEBULA
  Decision: Absa Bank Limited  vs. Tsakisi Mathebula absabanklimited.co.za - Transfer
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.