CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2019-00383 TRANSPET CC TRADING AS PETPORT vs. ESTELLE FOURIE
  petportsa.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00382 LFP TRAINING CONSULTANTS (PTY) LTD vs. LOKI SUN
  lfptraining.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00381 AFRICAN BANK LIMITED vs. DOM FORCE
  africanbankcreditcard.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00380 GUMTREE.COM LIMITED vs. CUMTREE / GREG FREDERICKS
  cumtree.co.za - Pending
cumtreedating.co.za - Pending
cumtreegirls.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00379 NOVO NORDISK A/S vs. LEO GRAY
  novonordisk.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00378 COMPUTER CORE BUSINESS (PTY) LTD vs. PMDVOIP (PTY) LTD
  istore.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00377 INOVA PHARMACEUTICALS (SINGAPORE) PTE LIMITED vs. ABDUL ABRAHAMS
  Decision: Inova Pharmaceuticals (Singapore) PTE Limited vs. Abdul Abrahams durominesouthafrica.co.za - Settled
   
   
ZA2019-00376 FIDELITY SECURITY SERVICES (PTY) LTD & FIDELITY SERVICES GROPU ( PTY) LTD & FIDELITY ADT ( PTY) LTD vs. RAIHAAN CHOTHIA
  Decision: Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd & Fidelity Services Gropu ( Pty) Ltd & Fidelity ADT ( Pty) Ltd vs. raihaan Chothia fidelityadt.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00375 THE SUGARLESS COMPANY PTY LTD vs. STEVEN GREEN
  Decision: The Sugarless Company Pty Ltd vs. Steven Green sugarless.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00374 HENDRIK VAN WYK VERVOER (PTY) LTD vs. ALMERO BOURBON
  Decision: Hendrik Van Wyk Vervoer (Pty) Ltd vs. Almero Bourbon hendrikvanwykvervoer.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00373 AFRIBET ( PTY) LTD vs. BARRY MURRELL
  Decision: Afribet ( Pty) Ltd vs. Barry Murrell afribet.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00372 JOHN PLANETS vs. DATA PROTECTED
  Decision: John Planets vs. Data Protected armytek.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00371 EAZI ACCESS RENTAL (PTY) LTD. vs. CHRIS LEE
  Decision: Eazi Access Rental (Pty) Ltd. vs. Chris Lee eaziaccess.co.za - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00370 FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED vs. DOM FORCE
  Decision: FirstRand Bank Limited vs. Dom Force firstnational-bank.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: FirstRand Bank Limited vs. Dom Force fnbbank.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: FirstRand Bank Limited vs. Dom Force fnbhomeloans.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00369 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. RONY RICH
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Rony Rich sarss.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00368 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. PIETER PIETERSE
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Pieter Pieterse sarstaxclearance.co.za - Withdrawn
   
   
ZA2019-00367 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. PORCHESTER PARTNERS INC.
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Porchester Partners Inc. sarseffiling.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00366 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. MALKHAZ KAPANADZE
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze wwwsarsefiling.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze sarsefing.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze sarsefling.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00365 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. JONAS PITTS
  Decision: The South African Revenue Services vs. Jonas Pitts sars-office - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00364 THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES vs. FURNCO TRUST
  Decision:  The South African Revenue Services vs. Furnco Trust mysars.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.