CASES & DECISIONS

YEAR DECISION
New: All decided cases have been profiled to enable search and filter on selected keywords.
 
Displaying the latest 10 cases
   
ZA2020-00395 ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION vs. ABICOM WEBS
  oracleconsult.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2020-00394 KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA T/A TOSHIBA CORPORATION vs. DENIS MARIANO
  toshibaelectronicscameras.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2020-00393 ABSA BANK LIMITED vs. WHOIS AGENT
  absa.net.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2020-00392 LEOPARD CREEK INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD vs. HASHTAGDESIGN
  leopardscreek.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2020-00391 AIRPORTS COMPANY SOUTH AFRICA SOC LTD vs. CECILIA NONKONYANE
  airportssa.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00390 RENAULT S.A.S vs. RENAULT REPAIR CENTRE & TRUDON TRUDON
  Decision: Renault S.A.S vs. Renault Repair Centre & Trudon Trudon renaultrepaircentre.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: Renault S.A.S vs. Renault Repair Centre & Trudon Trudon renau-repaircentre.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: Renault S.A.S vs. Renault Repair Centre & Trudon Trudon renaultrepaircentre1.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00389 RENAULT S.A.S vs. RONNEY REECE (FRENCH CAR SPECIALIST)
  renaultspecialist.co.za - Pending
   
   
ZA2019-00388 GOFUNDME, INC vs. PATRICK BOUGARD
  Decision: Gofundme, inc vs. Patrick Bougard yofundmi.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: Gofundme, inc vs. Patrick Bougard gofundmesouthafrica.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00387 GOFUNDME, INC vs. JOHN SCOTT
  Decision: Gofundme, inc vs. John Scott gofundmesa.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00386 AIRPORTS COMPANY SOUTH AFRICA SOC LTD OF THE MAPLES vs. KULE KIDEMBA
  Decision: AIRPORTS COMPANY SOUTH AFRICA SOC LTD OF THE MAPLES vs. KULE KIDEMBA airportsa.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00385 YVES SAINT LAURENT vs. ZHAO KE
  Decision: Yves Saint Laurent vs. Zhao Ke yvessaintlaurent.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00384 TELKOM SA SOC LIMITED vs. MALKHAZ KAPANADZE
  Decision: Telkom SA SOC Limited vs. Malkhaz Kapanadze wwwtelkom.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00383 TRANSPET CC TRADING AS PETPORT vs. ESTELLE FOURIE
  Decision: Transpet CC Trading as Petport vs. Estelle Fourie petportsa.co.za - Refused
   
   
ZA2019-00382 LFP TRAINING CONSULTANTS (PTY) LTD vs. LOKI SUN
  Decision: LFP Training Consultants (Pty) Ltd vs. Loki Sun lfptraining.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00381 AFRICAN BANK LIMITED vs. DOM FORCE
  Decision: African Bank Limited vs. Dom Force africanbankcreditcard.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00380 GUMTREE.COM LIMITED vs. CUMTREE / GREG FREDERICKS
  Decision: Gumtree.com Limited vs. Cumtree / Greg Fredericks cumtree.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: Gumtree.com Limited vs. Cumtree / Greg Fredericks cumtreedating.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
Decision: Gumtree.com Limited vs. Cumtree / Greg Fredericks cumtreegirls.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00379 NOVO NORDISK A/S vs. LEO GRAY
  Decision: Novo Nordisk A/S vs. Leo Gray novonordisk.co.za - Summary Decision - Transfer
   
   
ZA2019-00378 COMPUTER CORE BUSINESS (PTY) LTD vs. PMDVOIP (PTY) LTD
  Decision: Computer Core Business (Pty) Ltd vs. PMDVOIP (Pty) Ltd istore.co.za - Appeal-Refuse
   
   
ZA2019-00377 INOVA PHARMACEUTICALS (SINGAPORE) PTE LIMITED vs. ABDUL ABRAHAMS
  Decision: Inova Pharmaceuticals (Singapore) PTE Limited vs. Abdul Abrahams durominesouthafrica.co.za - Settled
   
   
ZA2019-00376 FIDELITY SECURITY SERVICES (PTY) LTD & FIDELITY SERVICES GROPU ( PTY) LTD & FIDELITY ADT ( PTY) LTD vs. RAIHAAN CHOTHIA
  Decision: Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd & Fidelity Services Gropu ( Pty) Ltd & Fidelity ADT ( Pty) Ltd vs. raihaan Chothia fidelityadt.co.za - Transfer
   


notice

DECISIONS MADE BY AN ADJUDICATOR IN TERMS OF THE REGULATIONS WILL BE DISPLAYED ON THIS PAGE AS AND WHEN AVAILABLE.

Regulation 29

(1) An adjudicator must decide a dispute in accordance with the principles of law, on the basis of the Dispute, Response, and Reply, if any, and further statements or documents submitted in accordance with these Regulations.

(2) The Adjudicator must forward its Decision on the dispute to the provider within 14 days of its appointment under regulation 20.

(3) The Decision must be in writing, provide the reasons on which it is based, indicate the date on which it was rendered and identify the name of the Adjudicator.

(4) If three adjudicators consider a Dispute, the consentient views of at least two adjudicators shall constitute the Decision.

(5) If one Adjudicator has a dissentient view, such view should also accompany the Decision.

(6) Decisions and dissentient views must comply with the guidelines as to length set forth in the provider's supplementary procedure.

 

Regulation 9

The possible decisions pursuant to a Dispute before an adjudicator are limited to -

(a) in the case of abusive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant;

(b) in the case of offensive registrations the refusal of the Dispute or the deletion and prohibition of the domain name from future registration;

(c) a refusal of the Dispute as the Dispute constitutes reverse domain name hijacking.

 

Please review the Resources Page for assistance on viewing foreign decisions.